All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/6] power: Explicitly select pmic device's bus
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:50:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A01422.1080806@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384250684-16124-3-git-send-email-l.krishna@samsung.com>

Dear Leela Krishna Amudala,

On 12/11/13 19:04, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> The current pmic i2c code assumes the current i2c bus is
> the same as the pmic device's bus. There is nothing ensuring
> that to be true. Therefore, select the proper bus before performing
> a transaction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>
> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/power/power_i2c.c |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/power_i2c.c b/drivers/power/power_i2c.c
> index ac76870..3cafa4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/power_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/power_i2c.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,45 @@
>  #include <i2c.h>
>  #include <compiler.h>
>  
> +static int pmic_select(struct pmic *p)
> +{
> +	int ret, old_bus;

I think, old prefix is meaningless.
please fix it globally.

> +
> +	old_bus = i2c_get_bus_num();
> +	if (old_bus != p->bus) {

How about return immediately if get a bus.

if (old_bus == p->bus)
	return old_bus;

> +		debug("%s: Select bus %d\n", __func__, p->bus);
> +		ret = i2c_set_bus_num(p->bus);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			debug("%s: Cannot select pmic %s, err %d\n",
> +			      __func__, p->name, ret);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return old_bus;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmic_deselect(int old_bus)

in your patch, you never check a return value.
then is it void function or wrong usage?

And I think pmic_deselect function is almost same with pmic_select.
If you change the parameter for pmic_select to "int bus" then,
What is different with pmic_select?

for example.

bus = pmic_select(p->bus);
/* do something */
pmic_deselect(bus);

is same with.

bus = pmic_select(p->bus);
/* do something */
pmic_select(bus);

How do you think?

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (old_bus != i2c_get_bus_num()) {
> +		ret = i2c_set_bus_num(old_bus);
> +		debug("%s: Select bus %d\n", __func__, old_bus);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			debug("%s: Cannot restore i2c bus, err %d\n",
> +			      __func__, ret);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int pmic_reg_write(struct pmic *p, u32 reg, u32 val)
>  {
>  	unsigned char buf[4] = { 0 };
> +	int ret, old_bus;
>  
>  	if (check_reg(p, reg))
>  		return -1;
> @@ -52,23 +88,33 @@ int pmic_reg_write(struct pmic *p, u32 reg, u32 val)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (i2c_write(pmic_i2c_addr, reg, 1, buf, pmic_i2c_tx_num))
> +	old_bus = pmic_select(p);
> +	if (old_bus < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	ret = i2c_write(pmic_i2c_addr, reg, 1, buf, pmic_i2c_tx_num);
> +	pmic_deselect(old_bus);

please add blank line.

> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int pmic_reg_read(struct pmic *p, u32 reg, u32 *val)
>  {
>  	unsigned char buf[4] = { 0 };
>  	u32 ret_val = 0;
> +	int ret, old_bus;
>  
>  	if (check_reg(p, reg))
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	if (i2c_read(pmic_i2c_addr, reg, 1, buf, pmic_i2c_tx_num))
> +	old_bus = pmic_select(p);
> +	if (old_bus < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
> +	ret = i2c_read(pmic_i2c_addr, reg, 1, buf, pmic_i2c_tx_num);
> +	pmic_deselect(old_bus);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	switch (pmic_i2c_tx_num) {
>  	case 3:
>  		if (p->sensor_byte_order == PMIC_SENSOR_BYTE_ORDER_BIG)
> @@ -98,9 +144,15 @@ int pmic_reg_read(struct pmic *p, u32 reg, u32 *val)
>  
>  int pmic_probe(struct pmic *p)
>  {
> -	i2c_set_bus_num(p->bus);
> +	int ret, old_bus;
> +
> +	old_bus = pmic_select(p);
> +	if (old_bus < 0)
> +		return -1;

please add blank line.

>  	debug("Bus: %d PMIC:%s probed!\n", p->bus, p->name);
> -	if (i2c_probe(pmic_i2c_addr)) {
> +	ret = i2c_probe(pmic_i2c_addr);
> +	pmic_deselect(old_bus);
> +	if (ret) {
>  		printf("Can't find PMIC:%s\n", p->name);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> 

Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-12 10:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] SMDK5420: Add S2MPS11 pmic support to SMDK5420 Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/6] exynos: Use common pmic_reg_update() definition Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-12-05  5:50   ` Minkyu Kang
2014-01-02 23:36     ` Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/6] power: Explicitly select pmic device's bus Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-12-05  5:50   ` Minkyu Kang [this message]
2014-01-02 23:37     ` Leela Krishna Amudala
2014-01-03  1:11       ` Minkyu Kang
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 3/6] FDT: Exynos5420: Add compatible srings for PMIC Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 4/6] SMDK5420: S2MPS11: Adds the register settings for S2MPS11 Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 5/6] exynos: Add a common DT based PMIC driver initialization Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-11-12 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 6/6] config: SMDK5420: Enable S2MPS11 pmic Leela Krishna Amudala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52A01422.1080806@samsung.com \
    --to=mk7.kang@samsung.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.