From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: RC0 imminent Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:05:28 +0000 Message-ID: <52A0B258.5090202@eu.citrix.com> References: <52A0B103.5000300@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VocMv-0006E7-07 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:05:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <52A0B103.5000300@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel Cc: Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?Y29kZXIvcGhjb2RlcicgU2VyYmluZW5rbw==?= , Fabio Fantoni , xen-devel , =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1v?= =?UTF-8?B?bm7DqQ==?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/05/2013 04:59 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 05/12/13 16:29, George Dunlap wrote: >> >> Features which might be worth highlighting for testing in blogs: >> >> * Event channel scalability >> - David Vrabel > I have a pending critical bug fix which I am running through some > automated tests right now. There's not much point in testing this > without the fix. > > I was also going to schedule some more extensive testing when a slot > becomes available, but if RC0 is imminent I will post the fix tomorrow > rather than waiting for further testing. > >> * kexec -- is this worth testing? >> - David Vrabel > Everything is worth testing... This has already seen a fair amount of > testing by various people already (as well as extensive testing in > XenServer's automated test system) so I don't think it needs to be > called out specifically for more testing. OK -- but is it something that is worthwhile calling out specifically as a cool new feature? Is it the kind of thing for which it would be helpful to raise awareness? -George