From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: RC0 imminent Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:06:09 +0000 Message-ID: <52A0B281.7050600@citrix.com> References: <20131205170105.GA12679@aepfle.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VocNR-0006K9-Ui for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:06:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20131205170105.GA12679@aepfle.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Olaf Hering Cc: George Dunlap , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/12/13 17:01, Olaf Hering wrote: > Because its almost Friday: > > On Thu, Dec 05, George Dunlap wrote: > >> * kexec -- is this worth testing? > > Its at least worth noting what this is all about ;-) > kexec Xen? This one. i.e., executing an image that replaces Xen. It's not a new feature, but a new, more reliable implementation. David