From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Disable writeback by default on ppc Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:58:01 -0200 Message-ID: <52A1D7E9.5080800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1371477978-25440-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com> <1371485240.13840.78.camel@localhost> <1383863356.4776.202.camel@pasglop> <527CEA7D.4060704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1385334947.4882.153.camel@pasglop> <5293E73E.8050704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <529FA9A5.4060706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1386207571.21910.0.camel@pasglop> <1386210592.31665.24.camel@thor.local> <1386216410.21910.3.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (e24smtp02.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.86]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63A5F9E6D for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 05:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:58:05 -0200 Received: from d24relay03.br.ibm.com (d24relay03.br.ibm.com [9.13.184.25]) by d24dlp01.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F32352006A for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:58:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (d24av04.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.97]) by d24relay03.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id rB6DvkZK29163678 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:57:47 -0200 Received: from d24av04.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av04.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id rB6Dw2Rd004878 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:58:03 -0200 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Alex Deucher Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michel_D=E4nzer?= , Maling list - DRI developers , Jerome Glisse , Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , Brian King List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 12/05/2013 12:42 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > Well, we'd need to start swapping indirect buffers and the ring as > well then which would get tricky as the CP at least does not have > separate swapping controls for different things. Probably easier to > fix up as appropriate for different asic families. We have function > pointers for the rtpr and wptr fetchers now, so we can do this pretty > cleanly. > > Alex Alex, Are you going to send a patch to fix this? If not, I don't have the knowledge of which asic families will need this fix, but if you inform me what needs to be done I can write the patch. Thanks, -- Kleber Sacilotto de Souza IBM Linux Technology Center