From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449D6E0079A for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 06075F811FB; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:28:05 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FROM, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD1CF811FB; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:28:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <52A20950.70501@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:28:48 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Patches due to bitbake changes X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:28:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-12-06 10:23, Dan McGregor wrote: > As of bitbake revision a9112a102a89049cda597dad449e922c9e957a5d the git fetcher checks for the SRCREV in the branch given to the fetcher. That is master by default. These three > recipes didn't specify the branch containing the SRCREV, so the fetcher failed even though the revision exists. These patches fix that for linux-wandboard in meta-fsl-arm-extra, > and for u-boot-fslc in meta-fsl-arm. > > Similar problems probably exist in other kernel and u-boot recipes, but since I only have a Wandboard, I didn't test those. > Why didn't you make the branch adjustable for u-boot-fslc? I for one use that as well, but not the same branch/rev.