From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tegra: add I2C controllers to Tegra124 DT Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:36:57 -0700 Message-ID: <52A20B39.7010703@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1386196016-25128-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20131206140333.GE30960@ulmo.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131206140333.GE30960-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 12/06/2013 07:03 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > [...] >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124.dtsi > [...] >> @@ -176,6 +176,96 @@ >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + i2c@7000c000 { >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-i2c"; > > Aren't we supposed to always list the most specific compatible as well, > just in case we ever need to implement a specific quirk in the future? > > So this would become: > > compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-i2c", "nvidia,tegra114-i2c"; Oops yes, I'll fix that up. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:36:57 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: tegra: add I2C controllers to Tegra124 DT In-Reply-To: <20131206140333.GE30960@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1386196016-25128-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20131206140333.GE30960@ulmo.nvidia.com> Message-ID: <52A20B39.7010703@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/06/2013 07:03 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:26:53PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > [...] >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124.dtsi > [...] >> @@ -176,6 +176,96 @@ >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + i2c at 7000c000 { >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-i2c"; > > Aren't we supposed to always list the most specific compatible as well, > just in case we ever need to implement a specific quirk in the future? > > So this would become: > > compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-i2c", "nvidia,tegra114-i2c"; Oops yes, I'll fix that up.