From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E6FE006D2 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 08:58:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 8C5F8F81221; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:58:40 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D1AF8121E; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:58:39 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <52A5F6F0.9080109@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:59:28 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1386605416-19779-1-git-send-email-rjohnweber@gmail.com> <52A5EF29.3040902@mlbassoc.com> <52A5EFA1.5060806@gmail.com> <52A5F142.70807@mlbassoc.com> <52A5F3BA.3030502@gmail.com> <52A5F58A.4080301@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] u-boot-fslc: Add tag to git SRC_URI X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:58:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-12-09 09:55, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> Do you have an use example where you'd need it? >>>> >>> I think he means to do something like this: >>> >>> GITTAG ??= "patches-2013.10" >>> SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Freescale/u-boot-imx.git;tag=${GITTAG}" >>> >>> This way he can override GITTAG in his .bbappend, correct? >> >> Correct. The ??= isn't even necessary since the .bbappend can >> always override it. > > In this case you're using an old version of the bootloader in your > internal BSP, right? I'd expect you to add an .bb file for this > version instead and use PREFERRED_VERSION to use it. Why should I do that when .bbappend works perfectly well? I can also see this as a case when new boards are added or old ones are still around and they get updated on different schedules. Also, what does it hurt to be flexible? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------