From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN default Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:43:55 +0100 Message-ID: <52A60F6B.6040700@interlog.com> References: <1386614243.2028.101.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Reply-To: dgilbert@interlog.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.infotech.no ([82.134.31.41]:53775 "EHLO smtp.infotech.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755920Ab3LISoB (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:44:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1386614243.2028.101.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , Alan Stern Cc: USB Storage list , SCSI development list On 13-12-09 07:37 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:24 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >> James: >> >> Is there any good reason why CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN still doesn't >> default to Y? > > Assuming we've got all the screw ups (mostly CD ROMS) blacklisted, I > think the only real reason is that some SCSI-2 devices don't respond to > stuff not on LUN 0, so it keeps the boot process quick. > > There isn't really any reason to change it, though, is there? The > option only applies to SCSI-2 and below devices which should be a self > obsoleting class as their motors start to burn out. and a couple of billion USB keys.