From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove IRQF_DISABLED Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:17:29 +0900 Message-ID: <52A63369.8010000@samsung.com> References: <000801cec874$%han@samsung.com> <1386579735-4065-1-git-send-email-michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f50.google.com ([209.85.160.50]:53963 "EHLO mail-pb0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761403Ab3LIVRf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:17:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1386579735-4065-1-git-send-email-michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Opdenacker Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 12/09/13 18:02, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag > > It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker > Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han > --- > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c | 3 +-- > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > index 4a65cba3295d..a8dafc174fe3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ int s3c2410_dma_request(enum dma_ch channel, > chan->irq_claimed = 1; > local_irq_restore(flags); > > - err = request_irq(chan->irq, s3c2410_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED, > + err = request_irq(chan->irq, s3c2410_dma_irq, 0, > client->name, (void *)chan); > > local_irq_save(flags); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > index 2ed2e32430dc..bb3eac6a7697 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ static void usb_simtec_enableoc(struct s3c2410_hcd_info *info, int on) > > if (on) { > ret = request_irq(BAST_IRQ_USBOC, usb_simtec_ocirq, > - IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | > - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > "USB Over-current", info); > if (ret != 0) { > printk(KERN_ERR "failed to request usb oc irq\n"); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > index a6b338fd0470..08a889c141da 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void smartq_usb_host_enableoc(struct s3c2410_hcd_info *info, int on) > > if (on) { > ret = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(S3C64XX_GPL(10)), > - smartq_usb_host_ocirq, IRQF_DISABLED | > + smartq_usb_host_ocirq, > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > "USB host overcurrent", info); > if (ret != 0) Looks OK to me, applied. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:17:29 +0900 Subject: [PATCH][RESEND] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove IRQF_DISABLED In-Reply-To: <1386579735-4065-1-git-send-email-michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> References: <000801cec874$%han@samsung.com> <1386579735-4065-1-git-send-email-michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <52A63369.8010000@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/09/13 18:02, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag > > It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker > Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han > --- > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c | 3 +-- > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > index 4a65cba3295d..a8dafc174fe3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/dma.c > @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ int s3c2410_dma_request(enum dma_ch channel, > chan->irq_claimed = 1; > local_irq_restore(flags); > > - err = request_irq(chan->irq, s3c2410_dma_irq, IRQF_DISABLED, > + err = request_irq(chan->irq, s3c2410_dma_irq, 0, > client->name, (void *)chan); > > local_irq_save(flags); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > index 2ed2e32430dc..bb3eac6a7697 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/simtec-usb.c > @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@ static void usb_simtec_enableoc(struct s3c2410_hcd_info *info, int on) > > if (on) { > ret = request_irq(BAST_IRQ_USBOC, usb_simtec_ocirq, > - IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | > - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > "USB Over-current", info); > if (ret != 0) { > printk(KERN_ERR "failed to request usb oc irq\n"); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > index a6b338fd0470..08a889c141da 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void smartq_usb_host_enableoc(struct s3c2410_hcd_info *info, int on) > > if (on) { > ret = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(S3C64XX_GPL(10)), > - smartq_usb_host_ocirq, IRQF_DISABLED | > + smartq_usb_host_ocirq, > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, > "USB host overcurrent", info); > if (ret != 0) Looks OK to me, applied. Thanks, Kukjin