From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, <brouer@redhat.com>,
<jpirko@redhat.com>, <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 1/2] net: sched: tbf: fix the calculation of max_size
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:04:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A676B8.4040300@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7473@saturn3.aculab.com>
On 2013/12/9 21:11, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Yang Yingliang [mailto:yangyingliang@huawei.com]
>> On 2013/12/9 18:07, David Laight wrote:
>>>> From: Yang Yingliang
>>>> On 2013/12/6 18:56, David Laight wrote:
>>>>>> From: Yang Yingliang
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> You are multiplying two values then dividing by 10**9
>>>>> I'd guess that the intermediate value might exceed 2**64.
>>>>>
>>>>>> + if (unlikely(r->linklayer == TC_LINKLAYER_ATM))
>>>>>> + len = (len / 53) * 48;
>>>>>
>>>>> You probably want to do the multiply first.
>>>>> But why not scale rate_bytes_ps instead.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When the linklayer is ATM, the formula to calculate tokens is:
>>>>
>>>> ((u64)(DIV_ROUND_UP(len,48)*53) * r->mult) >> r->shift
>>>>
>>>> So, I scale len here.
>>>
>>> Seems to me that there are a lot of unnecessary multiplies and
>>> divides going on here.
>>> Looks to me like the code was originally written to require one
>>> multiply and one shift for each packet.
>>
>> The way to calc tokens in psched_l2t_ns() means:
>> we got a payload which length is 'len'. To get the actual size we
>> need send, round len up to a multiple of 53. After getting the
>> size, we do multiply and shift to calculate tokens that we need.
>>
>>>
>>> In any case the latter code is allowing for more of the ATM cell
>>> overhead. I'm not at all sure the intent is to remove that when
>>> setting up the constants.
>>>
>>> OTOH should this code be worrying about the packet overheads at all?
>>> Does it add in the ethernet pre-emable, CRC and inter packet gap?
>>
>> This overhead is sent from userspace by tc.
>>
>>>
>>> I'd guess that the most the ATM code should do it round the length
>>> up to a multiple of 48 (user payload in a cell).
>>
>> 53 is ATM cell size include header, sending a header needs tokens as
>> well. I'd guess round the length up to a multiple of 53 in psched_l2t_ns()
>> is necessary.
>
> The point I'm trying to make is that in one place you multiply by 53/48
> and in the other you multiply be 48/53.
> These two operations almost certainly cancel each other out.
> Or would modulo small rounding errors if you did the multiplies first.
> So why do either of them?
Current kernel does multiplication by 53/48 to calculate tokens in
psched_l2t_ns(). It expands a packet length. So I need reduce the
length which is used as max_size in psched_ns_t2l(), or it will be
too big to get enough tokens.
len = (len / 53) * 48;
Here I do division first, because the length to calculate tokens is
53bytes at least. If len < 53, means that no packet can pass, we
should set len to 0.
Regards,
Yang
>
> Whether you should be rounding up ATM data to a whole number of cells
> is a different question entirely.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-06 7:00 [PATCH net v6 0/2] net: sched: fix two issues Yang Yingliang
2013-12-06 7:00 ` [PATCH net v6 1/2] net: sched: tbf: fix the calculation of max_size Yang Yingliang
2013-12-06 10:56 ` David Laight
2013-12-09 2:26 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 3:26 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 10:07 ` David Laight
2013-12-09 12:21 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 13:10 ` [PATCH RFC ] " Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-10 2:29 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-10 2:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-09 13:11 ` [PATCH net v6 1/2] " David Laight
2013-12-10 2:04 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2013-12-06 7:00 ` [PATCH net v6 2/2] net: sched: htb: fix the calculation of quantum Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A676B8.4040300@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.