From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claudio Scordino Subject: Re: Best board for ARM ? Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:11:38 +0100 Message-ID: <52A6CCBA.8050404@evidence.eu.com> References: <52A5E54A.3060106@evidence.eu.com> <1386604414.7812.32.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1386607731.5488.10.camel@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1386607731.5488.10.camel@Solace> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli , Ian Campbell Cc: Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Dear all, thank you for your help. >> Arndale is probably the best bet. Allwinner based stuff (aka sunxi) is >> less well tested overall but might have better availability, it is also >> super cheap in most cases (e.g. cubieboard2/truck). >> > Ok, thanks Ian for the info! > > In case one wants to go for cubie, this is where all the information > lives, right? > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Allwinner > > Is it still current? Have things got any better lately, from either > Linux or Xen side? > > While this is, I think, the same for Arndale: > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Arndale > which does look less "hacky", at least at a first glance... > > Claudio, perhaps you can investigate how easy it would be for you to get > an Arndale board, and fallback on cubie2/truck if it's actually that > hard? I checked. Arndale says 4 weeks to ship, which may be a too long time (especially if not respected). Cubie2, instead, is available in stock on several distributors. Claudio