From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec/x86: Do not map crash kernel area Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:54:27 +0000 Message-ID: <52A70F03.5050805@citrix.com> References: <1386612083-21453-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <52A608F8.6040901@cantab.net> <52A6DC85020000780010BAE3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VqMpc-00068U-CF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:54:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <52A6DC85020000780010BAE3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: David Vrabel , andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Daniel Kiper , keir@xen.org, xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/12/13 08:19, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 09.12.13 at 19:16, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 09/12/2013 18:01, Daniel Kiper wrote: >>> Do not map crash kernel area. This mapping is not in use anymore. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper >> >> Acked-by: David Vrabel >> >> However, this isn't a bug fix so I don't think it's suitable 4.4 now. > > I think this is quite clearly a bug fix, taking into consideration our > earlier discussion about systems with more memory (16Tb if the > physical address map is mostly contiguous) than Xen can handle. Oh yes, of course. I'd forgotten about that. David