[Buildroot] [PATCH v5 1/1] ktap: new package

[Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>]

On 10/12/13 15:49, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   > The first seems to emphasize that we require a Linux kernel to be
>>   > built in buildroot, while the second one leaves it in the middle. For
>>   > packages that actually build kernel modules, like ktap, we really need
>>   > the kernel inside buildroot, right? Are there any packages that depend
>>   > on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL that do _not_ require an in-buildroot kernel?
>>
>> I don't think so, as BR2_LINUX_KERNEL is the symbol to build a linux
>> kernel internally.
>
> Ok, sounds logical.
> So what is the best comment text? Simply:
> "foo needs a Linux kernel to be built"

  Sounds good to me. "to be built by buildroot" would be more accurate 
but probably too verbose.

  Regards,
  Arnout

> ?
>
> If we can agree on something I will submit a patch to make this consistent.
>
> Thanks,
> thomas
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F