From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] xen/arm: do not add a second irq to the LRs if one is already present
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:06:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A79074.3060900@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386701456-20307-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
On 12/10/2013 06:50 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> When the guest re-enable IRQs, do not add guest IRQs to LRs twice.
>
> Suggested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> index a16bdf1..ab788da 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
> irq = i + (32 * n);
> p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
> set_bit(_GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status);
> - if ( !list_empty(&p->inflight) )
> + if ( !list_empty(&p->inflight) && !test_bit(_GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) )
> gic_set_guest_irq(v, irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p->priority);
> i++;
> }
>
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-10 18:49 [PATCH v3 0/6] interrupt handling fixes Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] xen/arm: Physical IRQ is not always equal to virtual IRQ Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] xen/arm: track the state of guest IRQs Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-11 14:38 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-11 19:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-12 11:55 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-12 14:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] xen/arm: do not add a second irq to the LRs if one is already present Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 22:06 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: implement gic_irq_enable and gic_irq_disable Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 21:30 ` Julien Grall
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] xen/arm: Only enable physical IRQs when the guest asks Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 21:11 ` Julien Grall
2013-12-11 12:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-11 13:34 ` Julien Grall
2013-12-11 13:38 ` Julien Grall
2013-12-11 17:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 18:50 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] xen/arm: disable a physical IRQ when the guest disables the corresponding IRQ Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-10 22:05 ` Julien Grall
2013-12-10 22:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] interrupt handling fixes Julien Grall
2013-12-11 14:19 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A79074.3060900@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.