From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([2001:1868:205::10] helo=mail.zytor.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VqWtR-0001bb-Og for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:39:12 +0000 Message-ID: <52A7A5D9.9030504@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:38:01 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kexec kernel efi runtime support References: <1386582147-9802-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131210152549.7975e3ac25d854e2ada63221@linux-foundation.org> <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com, matt@console-pimps.org, greg@kroah.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, horms@verge.net.au, ebiederm@xmission.com, Dave Young , vgoyal@redhat.com On 12/10/2013 03:32 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:25:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young wrote: >> >>> Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime. >> >> It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a "kexec" >> patch which actually hits on efi and x86. >> >> I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't be offended if someone >> else merges them ;) > > I was under the impression that this should go through Matt's efi tree. > Oh, and we need to finish reviewing them so picking them up now would be > too premature, IMHO. > My intent was to pick them into a separate branch of the tip tree either directly or via Matt (since Matt feeds us anyway.) But yes, work is still underway, although it is getting there. -hpa _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kexec kernel efi runtime support Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:38:01 -0800 Message-ID: <52A7A5D9.9030504@zytor.com> References: <1386582147-9802-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131210152549.7975e3ac25d854e2ada63221@linux-foundation.org> <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131210233207.GI31437-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Young , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org, James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org, vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org, kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org, toshi.kani-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/2013 03:32 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:25:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young wrote: >> >>> Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime. >> >> It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a "kexec" >> patch which actually hits on efi and x86. >> >> I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't be offended if someone >> else merges them ;) > > I was under the impression that this should go through Matt's efi tree. > Oh, and we need to finish reviewing them so picking them up now would be > too premature, IMHO. > My intent was to pick them into a separate branch of the tip tree either directly or via Matt (since Matt feeds us anyway.) But yes, work is still underway, although it is getting there. -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751948Ab3LJXjZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:39:25 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54078 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751924Ab3LJXjX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:39:23 -0500 Message-ID: <52A7A5D9.9030504@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:38:01 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton CC: Dave Young , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, horms@verge.net.au, kexec@lists.infradead.org, greg@kroah.com, matt@console-pimps.org, toshi.kani@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kexec kernel efi runtime support References: <1386582147-9802-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131210152549.7975e3ac25d854e2ada63221@linux-foundation.org> <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20131210233207.GI31437@pd.tnic> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/2013 03:32 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:25:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young wrote: >> >>> Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime. >> >> It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a "kexec" >> patch which actually hits on efi and x86. >> >> I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't be offended if someone >> else merges them ;) > > I was under the impression that this should go through Matt's efi tree. > Oh, and we need to finish reviewing them so picking them up now would be > too premature, IMHO. > My intent was to pick them into a separate branch of the tip tree either directly or via Matt (since Matt feeds us anyway.) But yes, work is still underway, although it is getting there. -hpa