From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42659)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VqeWW-00064n-KL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:48:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VqeWM-0003t8-MQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:48:00 -0500
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52A818A0.9090309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:47:44 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1385364460-24332-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>	<1385364460-24332-3-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
	<529DA675.8030705@redhat.com> <529DE041.70006@suse.de>
	<529DE3F0.2050101@redhat.com> <529DEC1A.2030306@suse.de>
	<529DF195.3090107@redhat.com> <52A7F622.4040203@ozlabs.ru>
In-Reply-To: <52A7F622.4040203@ozlabs.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] machine: introduce get_fw_dev_path()
	callback
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>, Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>, =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOpIFBvdXNzaW5lYXU=?= <hpoussin@reactos.org>

Il 11/12/2013 06:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> 
> Any progress on this?
> 
> I am asking since the patchset about bootindex you gave me yesterday prints
> "(process:38896): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_foreach: assertion
> `version == hash_table->version' failed" which I "fixed" by moving the
> machine object creation chunk before kvm_init() in vl.c.
> 
> btw what do I do with that patchset now? I works for me (except the issue
> above), do I have to repost it again? Thanks.

Please do, but we need to sort out the get_fw_dev_path suffixes first.
I'll be on IRC in ~1 hour.

Paolo