From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from turboconrad.planet-school.de (turboconrad.planet-school.de [194.116.187.108]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D27FE00798 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:44:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from turboconrad.planet-school.de (srv004.service.ps-server.net [194.116.186.79]) by turboconrad.planet-school.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B955B6A080 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:44:03 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on srv004.service.ps-server.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, LOCAL_USER_RULE,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (ppp-188-174-106-60.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.106.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@philipp-wagner.com) by turboconrad.planet-school.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDB40B6A055 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:44:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52AF6610.9040102@philipp-wagner.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:44:00 +0100 From: Philipp Wagner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <1386505062-7542-1-git-send-email-lists@philipp-wagner.com> <52A8AB88.8000107@mlbassoc.com> <52A8B299.3000704@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <52A8B299.3000704@mlbassoc.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] linux: Update to 3.12.3 (latest RPI upstream) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:44:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 11.12.2013 19:44, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2013-12-11 11:23, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Gary Thomas > > wrote: >> >> On 2013-12-11 11:08, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:17 PM, > > >> wrote: >> >> From: Philipp Wagner > > >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Philipp Wagner > > >> >> --- >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb >> >> > > | >> 6 ------ >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb >> >> > > | >> 6 ++++++ >> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb >> >> > > >> create mode 100644 >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb >> >> > > >> >> diff --git >> a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb >> >> > > >> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb >> >> > > >> >> deleted file mode 100644 >> index 3631da5..0000000 >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.0.bb >> >> > > >> >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ >> -SRCREV = "__839f349b6ed2a63a2bff0b5f0d718a__7b07ca2316" >> -SRC_URI = >> "git://github.com/raspberrypi/__linux.git;protocol=git;branch=__rpi-3.12.y >> >> >> > __> >> \ >> >> - file://__sl030raspberrypii2ckernel.__patch \ >> - " >> - >> -require linux-raspberrypi.inc >> diff --git >> a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb >> >> > > >> b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb >> >> > > >> >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..304c1ad >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-__raspberrypi_3.12.3.bb >> >> > > >> >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >> +SRCREV = "__7dac37b9865ab51f7a68b7703bf679__2b698fee1b" >> >> >> >> As pointed in https://review.gherzan.ro:__8443/#/c/27/ >> , it seems this SRCREV is >> invalid. >> >> >> Since that note has little detail, are you sure that this is not >> just a case where the desired SRCREV is on a branch other than >> 'master'? >> With the latest bitbake master, you have to explicitly specify the >> branch >> if the desired revision is on a different branch. >> >> >> I know. But the branch is already specified in SRC_URI. So most >> probably upstream sqashed the repo? > > Indeed, I just checked the repo and it's not there. > > Looks like the correct rev might be > 9fbb114990c409406ae20c56871727ff8d4fa6ca > I may give this a go as it has V4L2 drivers for my camera which I'm anxious > to get going with Yocto :-) Oops, I totally forgot to reply. Yes, the revision existed but upstream seems to be great at modifying a published repository (this has happened before). [Maybe someone could give them an introduction how to handle published git repositories ... argh] To go forward, just drop this patch and go with the one Gary posted today. Philipp