All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] staging: ion: Fix possible null pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:37:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AF9CB7.90003@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMbhsRRMMMreYzLMZHxjrRrKj0rZdS5SjLNbpGUuW93mg+Q65w@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/16/2013 04:26 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:32 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>> The kbuild test robot reported:
>>
>> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c:122 alloc_largest_available() error: potential null dereference 'info'.  (kmalloc returns null)
>>
>> Where the pointer returned from kmalloc goes unchecked for failure.
>>
>> This patch adds a simple check for a null return, and handles the error.
>>
>> XXX: Not sure if continue or 'return NULL' is the right thing to do.
> Returning NULL is fine, there is no reason the kmalloc is going to
> succeed if it retries, and it will just have to allocate more of them
> if it starts fulfilling the allocation with smaller order chunks.
>
> Allocating the struct before entering the loop might make error handling easier.

Ok, I had actually done that in my first pass, but then got worried the
allocation/free might have extra overhead in the case where the pool is
exhausted, so I stuck with the existing pattern. But if that's not a
common state, then I agree, it does make the handling simpler.

I'll rework this and re-submit. Thanks for the feedback!

thanks
-john

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-17  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-16 21:32 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ION fixups for staging-next John Stultz
2013-12-16 21:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] staging: ion: Add HAVE_MEMBLOCK config dependency John Stultz
2013-12-16 21:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] staging: ion: Fix possible null pointer dereference John Stultz
2013-12-16 21:40   ` Greg KH
2013-12-17  0:26   ` Colin Cross
2013-12-17  0:37     ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-12-16 21:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] staging: ion: Avoid using rt_mutexes directly John Stultz
2013-12-17  0:17   ` Colin Cross
2013-12-17  1:22     ` John Stultz
2013-12-17  1:34       ` Colin Cross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AF9CB7.90003@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.