From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gao feng Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: clear RTF_EXPIRES when call ip6_rt_copy Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:48:04 +0800 Message-ID: <52B0F0C4.1010803@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1387182666-31301-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com> <52AFC43C.9080804@cn.fujitsu.com> <52AFE7E3.3070806@cn.fujitsu.com> <20131217070231.GA11970@order.stressinduktion.org> <52B00150.3070002@cn.fujitsu.com> <20131217134823.GC18396@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: RongQing Li , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:2093 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750872Ab3LRArH (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:47:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131217134823.GC18396@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/17/2013 09:48 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:46:24PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >> The from of new cloned rt should not be set if it's impossible for the ort >> to be expired. > > Actually, why do you think so? What could go wrong? > I just don't want rt6_check_expired to check some impossible expired routes.