From: micky <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: <sameo@linux.intel.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>,
<rogerable@realtek.com>, <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mfd: rtsx: reduce code duplication in rtl8411
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:17:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B0F7A6.20601@realsil.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131217072842.GZ28413@mwanda>
On 12/17/2013 03:28 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:36:58AM +0800, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> index 947e79b..26b52ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> @@ -63,4 +63,12 @@ static inline u8 map_sd_drive(int idx)
>> #define rtl8411_reg_to_sd30_drive_sel_3v3(reg) (((reg) >> 5) & 0x07)
>> #define rtl8411b_reg_to_sd30_drive_sel_3v3(reg) ((reg) & 0x03)
>>
>> +#define set_pull_ctrl_tables(__device) \
>> +do { \
>> + pcr->sd_pull_ctl_enable_tbl = __device##_sd_pull_ctl_enable_tbl; \
>> + pcr->sd_pull_ctl_disable_tbl = __device##_sd_pull_ctl_disable_tbl; \
>> + pcr->ms_pull_ctl_enable_tbl = __device##_ms_pull_ctl_enable_tbl; \
>> + pcr->ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl = __device##_ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl; \
>> +} while (0)
>> +
>> #endif
> This is nasty... With readable code, you should understand just from
> looking at it what the code is doing but this obscures it completely.
> It shouldn't reference the "pcr" variable without passing it in as an
> argument but even with that cleanup I don't really like it.
>
> To be honest, I don't see the problem with the original code.
>
>
Using macro can reduce some code, and define as set_pull_ctl_tables(pcr,
dev)
is much better for understand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 2:36 [PATCH v3 0/2] mfd: rtsx: decrease driver size and add new device micky_ching
2013-12-17 2:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mfd: rtsx: reduce code duplication in rtl8411 micky_ching
2013-12-17 7:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-12-18 1:17 ` micky [this message]
2013-12-17 8:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-12-17 2:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mfd: rtsx: add card reader rtl8402 micky_ching
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B0F7A6.20601@realsil.com.cn \
--to=micky_ching@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.