From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753265Ab3LRK3i (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:29:38 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:59075 "EHLO mail-bk0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751196Ab3LRK3g (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:29:36 -0500 Message-ID: <52B1790A.5070105@bjorling.me> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:29:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matias_Bj=F8rling?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuanhan Liu , Ming Lei CC: Fengguang Wu , Huang Ying , Jens Axboe , LKML Subject: Re: changes caused by 0d11e6ac("blk-mq: fix use-after-free of request") References: <20131218085007.GP31783@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20131218085007.GP31783@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/2013 09:50 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > Hi, > > FYI, we noticed some changes caused by 0d11e6ac("blk-mq: fix use-after-free of request"): > The blk-mq accounting was faulty up to that commit. We should compare the blk-mq with the previous block layer. Could you try to revert the following patches: f02b9ac virtio-blk: virtqueue_kick() must be ordered with other... 1cf7e9c virtio_blk: blk-mq support and compare the two runs (upto 0d11e6ac applied, and the same, with the two patches reverted) Thanks