From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 0/7] pktgen IPsec support Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:41:22 -0500 Message-ID: <52B1A602.2090903@mojatatu.com> References: <1387094284-2901-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com> <52AEF4ED.4020504@mojatatu.com> <52AFB580.5060403@windriver.com> <52B05482.7030400@gmail.com> <52B0FEEB.70508@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim , davem@davemloft.net, steffen.klassert@secunet.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Fan Du Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:36367 "EHLO mail-ie0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752673Ab3LRNlZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:41:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e14so10193158iej.40 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:41:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52B0FEEB.70508@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/17/13 20:48, Fan Du wrote: > >> Maybe i missed something - receiver wasnt affected in the discussion. >> It was only the sender. > > It's in this thread, see: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg260537.html > Ok, in that case please add my acked-by > No, those information does not belong to pktgen at all. > > All we need is a 'spi' to point which SA to employ for the > transformation. The SA, either > manually created temporally for pktgen test, or using existing > one(though with different > tmpl info)will describe specific type(ESP/AH) or > mode(Transport/Tunnel) in use. > Fair enough. cheers, jamal