From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45788)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1VtI0j-0006gH-Ns
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:22:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1VtI0e-0001eu-6O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:22:05 -0500
Message-ID: <52B1AF81.6040600@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:21:53 -0600
From: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1383312955-2607-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com>
	<1383312955-2607-2-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com>
	<4213554E-82D9-4563-A95D-CAC96E85F710@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA8GwMbyR8s4PNiF5eVjTY+r3b7gsoQeOy8JG9CiZv-TNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8GwMbyR8s4PNiF5eVjTY+r3b7gsoQeOy8JG9CiZv-TNA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH V3 01/19] Fix float64_to_uint64
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org list:PowerPC" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 12/17/2013 7:52 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 December 2013 13:42, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>> Softfloat really isn't my area of expertise and I'd prefer to see these
>> patches go in through a different tree :). Peter, do you want to take
>> care of this patch and "Add float32_to_uint64()"? Or at least give
>> me your reviewed-by tag and I'll send it through my tree since the
>> second one is a build dependency for VSX patches.
>>
>> I've also seen comments on folding in bugfixes for patches that
>> occurred earlier. I presume this is one of these cases. Mind to
>> shed some light on this?
> 
> Yeah, these are on my to-review list (we need the fixes for aarch64
> too :-)) but I'm waiting for Tom to post an updated patchset which
> has the complete set of softfloat fixes rather than having one
> patchset with a first version and a different patchset with a patch
> which fixes bugs in the first one...
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

So it would seem to make the most sense to go back and do what I had done
originally -- separate the softfloat fixes into their own patch set and
make the VSX and P7 patches dependent on those.  Agree?