All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tim@xen.org,
	george.dunlap@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m: Don't create new table when the mapping is removed
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:28:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B31092.9080600@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387445896.9925.7.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>

On 12/19/2013 09:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:31 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> When  Xen is removing/relinquishing mapping, it will create second/third tables
>> if they don't exist.
>>
>> Non-existent table means the address range was never mapped, so Xen can safely
>> skip them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>     Release: This is an improvement for Xen 4.4. It will save time during
>>     relinquish phase and avoid dummy allocation.
>>     The downside is the patch is modifying p2m loop which is used everywhere.
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/p2m.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> index d24a6fc..9ef8819 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> @@ -246,10 +246,12 @@ static int create_p2m_entries(struct domain *d,
>>                    cur_first_offset = ~0,
>>                    cur_second_offset = ~0;
>>      unsigned long count = 0;
>> +    bool_t populate = (op == INSERT || op == ALLOCATE);
>>  
>>      spin_lock(&p2m->lock);
>>  
>> -    for(addr = start_gpaddr; addr < end_gpaddr; addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>> +    addr = start_gpaddr;
>> +    while ( addr < end_gpaddr )
>>      {
>>          if ( cur_first_page != p2m_first_level_index(addr) )
>>          {
>> @@ -265,8 +267,15 @@ static int create_p2m_entries(struct domain *d,
>>  
>>          if ( !first[first_table_offset(addr)].p2m.valid )
>>          {
>> +            if ( !populate )
>> +            {
>> +                addr += FIRST_SIZE;
> 
> I think this subtly does the wrong thing if addr is not FIRST_SIZE
> aligned, which it might be on the first iteration. That will skip the
> start of the next 1st level block.
> 
> I think addr needs to be rounded up to the next first boundary.

Right, I will send a new version of this patch.

-- 
Julien Grall

      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-19 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-18 17:31 [PATCH] xen/arm: p2m: Don't create new table when the mapping is removed Julien Grall
2013-12-18 19:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-18 19:29   ` Julien Grall
2013-12-18 19:31     ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-12-19  9:38 ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-19 15:28   ` Julien Grall [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52B31092.9080600@linaro.org \
    --to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.