From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:41:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: add clk accuracy retrieval support In-Reply-To: <20131219193633.18119.57678@quantum> References: <1387290983-6236-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1387290983-6236-2-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131219060431.18119.64699@quantum> <52B2B42F.9010202@overkiz.com> <20131219193633.18119.57678@quantum> Message-ID: <52B34BE3.7000208@overkiz.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 19/12/2013 20:36, Mike Turquette a ?crit : > Quoting boris brezillon (2013-12-19 00:54:07) >> Hello Mike, >> >> On 19/12/2013 07:04, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2013-12-17 06:36:22) >>>> +unsigned long __clk_get_accuracy(struct clk *clk) >>>> +{ >>>> + unsigned long ret; >>>> + >>>> + if (!clk) >>>> + return 0; >>>> + >>>> + return clk->accuracy; >>>> +} >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_accuracy); >>> Any reason for exporting this? >> This might be used by clk drivers to choose the most accurate clk >> among its parent clks (within the determinate_rate callback). >> >> And as some clk drivers might be compiled as modules we need >> to export the symbol (__clk_get_name helper function is exported >> too). > Does your driver need this or is this just following the existing > __clk_get_rate / clk_get_rate model? No, I don't need this for my driver, at least for the moment. Do you want me to drop this EXPORT_SYMBOL ? > > Regards, > Mike > >> Best Regards, >> >> Boris >>> Regards, >>> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: add clk accuracy retrieval support Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:41:23 +0100 Message-ID: <52B34BE3.7000208@overkiz.com> References: <1387290983-6236-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1387290983-6236-2-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131219060431.18119.64699@quantum> <52B2B42F.9010202@overkiz.com> <20131219193633.18119.57678@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131219193633.18119.57678@quantum> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette , Rob Landley , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Russell King , Nicolas Ferre , =?UTF-8?B?VXdlIEtsZWluZS1Lw7ZuaQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?Zw==?= Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Le 19/12/2013 20:36, Mike Turquette a =C3=A9crit : > Quoting boris brezillon (2013-12-19 00:54:07) >> Hello Mike, >> >> On 19/12/2013 07:04, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2013-12-17 06:36:22) >>>> +unsigned long __clk_get_accuracy(struct clk *clk) >>>> +{ >>>> + unsigned long ret; >>>> + >>>> + if (!clk) >>>> + return 0; >>>> + >>>> + return clk->accuracy; >>>> +} >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_accuracy); >>> Any reason for exporting this? >> This might be used by clk drivers to choose the most accurate clk >> among its parent clks (within the determinate_rate callback). >> >> And as some clk drivers might be compiled as modules we need >> to export the symbol (__clk_get_name helper function is exported >> too). > Does your driver need this or is this just following the existing > __clk_get_rate / clk_get_rate model? No, I don't need this for my driver, at least for the moment. Do you want me to drop this EXPORT_SYMBOL ? > > Regards, > Mike > >> Best Regards, >> >> Boris >>> Regards, >>> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel