From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:03:52 -0500 Subject: [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: keystone: device tree updates for 3.14 In-Reply-To: <8761qkjvf5.fsf@linaro.org> References: <1387230397-14338-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <8761qkjvf5.fsf@linaro.org> Message-ID: <52B38968.5070509@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Kevin, On Thursday 19 December 2013 06:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Santosh Shilimkar writes: > >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin, >> >> Please pull below keystone device tree updates for 3.14 >> >> Regards, >> Santosh >> >> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae: >> >> Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux-keystone.git tags/keystone-dts >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 732079567da4942b7b4929deff8f236926d0b3eb: >> >> ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings (2013-12-12 20:29:17 -0500) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Keystone DTS updates for 3.14 >> >> - ddr3 pll clock node typo fixup. >> - EVM specific clock setting with board k2hk-evm.dts. >> - GIC node updates for missing virtualisation info. >> - Adding USB dwc3 and phy nodes. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Murali Karicheri (3): >> ARM: keystone: dts: add a k2hk-evm specific dts file >> ARM: keystone: dts: fix typo in the ddr3 pllclk node name >> ARM: keystone: dts: add paclk divider clock node >> >> Santosh Shilimkar (2): >> ARM: dts: keystone: Add the GICV and GICH address space >> ARM: dts: keystone: Add guestos maintenance interrupt >> >> WingMan Kwok (2): >> ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb phy devicetree bindings >> ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings > > I'm not willing to pull these new bindings. > > These new bindings don't have an ack from DT maintainers, and from a > quick scan of the archives, don't appear to have ever been posted to the > DT list. If they had been posted to the DT list, and hadn't had a > response after 2 weeks, it would've been OK for you to queue them up for > us, but as it stands they haven't even been posted for the attention of > the DT maintainers. Please remedy that. Thanks. > Not sure if you got confused because of the subject line on couple of patches. There are no new dt bindings in $subject pull request. Its all just updating the machine dts files for existing bindings. And hence explicitly not sent for device tree list. I have some more dt patches which adds new bindings which has been getting reviewed with dt folks. And since they are not yet acked, i haven't included them in the series. Can you please check one more time and let me know if I am missing something ? Regards, Santosh