From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoED-0000Ld-5M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:46:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoE7-0003Re-5f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:46:09 -0500 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=51905 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoE6-0003KH-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:46:03 -0500 Message-ID: <52B392D3.4040409@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:44:03 +0800 From: Li Guang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1387386003-8949-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/13] QMP queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , QEMU Developers , Anthony Liguori , Luiz Capitulino Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 December 2013 16:59, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> qerror: Remove assert_no_error() >> > This broke my target-arm pullreq :-( > Yes, QMP queue and qemu-arm queue will conflict, because patch "target-arm/cpu: Convert reset CBAR to a property" used assert_no_error, and here, assert_no_error removed. > -- PMM > > >