Re: [patch ipsec-next 4/5] xfrm: fix checkpatch error

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

Hello.

On 20-12-2013 14:49, Chen Weilong wrote:

> From: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>

> Fix that "else should follow close brace '}'".

> Signed-off-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
> ---
>   net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index fbc72b4..0ed4770 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -1316,8 +1316,7 @@ xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one(struct xfrm_policy *policy, const struct flowi *fl,
>   			error = (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ?
>   				 -EINVAL : -EAGAIN);
>   			xfrm_state_put(x);
> -		}
> -		else if (error == -ESRCH)
> +		} else if (error == -ESRCH)
>   			error = -EAGAIN;

    According to CodingStyle, both branches of *if* should have {}, if one has 
it. You may as well fix this.

WBR, Sergei