From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Scott Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libxl: ocaml: use int64 for timeval fields in the timeout_register callback Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:28:36 +0000 Message-ID: <52B46224.6040103@eu.citrix.com> References: <1386866211-12639-1-git-send-email-rob.hoes@citrix.com> <1386866211-12639-3-git-send-email-rob.hoes@citrix.com> <21161.59304.396688.333495@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <360717C0B01E6345BCBE64B758E22C2D1AC329@AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net> <21161.59822.56479.935901@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <360717C0B01E6345BCBE64B758E22C2D1AC3C7@AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net> <21161.61138.126582.556698@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <360717C0B01E6345BCBE64B758E22C2D1AC4E5@AMSPEX01CL03.citrite.net> <21161.62896.78144.803783@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <21162.293.975922.184727@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1387211886.21086.29.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <21167.13084.239326.622482@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21167.13084.239326.622482@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell Cc: Dave Scott , Rob Hoes , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/12/13 17:06, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/3] libxl: ocaml: use int64 for timeval fields in the timeout_register callback"): >> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:32 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> I now think this is fine. >> >> Sorry for not following along properly -- do you mean the original patch >> is fine or that one of the other schemes discussed in this thread is >> going to be OK once implemented? > > I mean that I approve of the plan to use two int64's as in Rob's > proposal. I'm also happy with the two int64 plan. Acked-by: David Scott