[GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: keystone: device tree updates for 3.14

[santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)]

On Friday 20 December 2013 10:51 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> 
>> Kevin,
>>
>> On Thursday 19 December 2013 06:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>>>
>>>> Please pull below keystone device tree updates for 3.14
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Santosh
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>>>
>>>>   Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux-keystone.git tags/keystone-dts
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 732079567da4942b7b4929deff8f236926d0b3eb:
>>>>
>>>>   ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings (2013-12-12 20:29:17 -0500)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Keystone DTS updates for 3.14
>>>>
>>>> - ddr3 pll clock node typo fixup.
>>>> - EVM specific clock setting with board k2hk-evm.dts.
>>>> - GIC node updates for missing virtualisation info.
>>>> - Adding USB dwc3 and phy nodes.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Murali Karicheri (3):
>>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add a k2hk-evm specific dts file
>>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: fix typo in the ddr3 pllclk node name
>>>>       ARM: keystone: dts: add paclk divider clock node
>>>>
>>>> Santosh Shilimkar (2):
>>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add the GICV and GICH address space
>>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add guestos maintenance interrupt
>>>>
>>>> WingMan Kwok (2):
>>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb phy devicetree bindings
>>>>       ARM: dts: keystone: Add usb devicetree bindings
>>>
>>> I'm not willing to pull these new bindings.
>>>
>>> These new bindings don't have an ack from DT maintainers, and from a
>>> quick scan of the archives, don't appear to have ever been posted to the
>>> DT list.  If they had been posted to the DT list, and hadn't had a
>>> response after 2 weeks, it would've been OK for you to queue them up for
>>> us, but as it stands they haven't even been posted for the attention of
>>> the DT maintainers.  Please remedy that.  Thanks.
>>>
>> Not sure if you got confused because of the subject line on couple
>> of patches. There are no new dt bindings in $subject pull request.
>> Its all just updating the machine dts files for existing bindings.
>> And hence explicitly not sent for device tree list.
>>
>> I have some more dt patches which adds new bindings which has been
>> getting reviewed with dt folks. And since they are not yet acked,
>> i haven't included them in the series.
>>
>> Can you please check one more time and let me know if I am missing
>> something ?
> 
> It was the creation of new files in Documentation/devicetree/bindings
> that I saw with no review/ack etc. that I was referring to.  Having a
> closer look, I see they're just adding documentation for SoC specific
> parts of existing bindings, so we can merge those.
> 
> Pulled into next/dt.
> 
Thanks Kevin !!