From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net_sched: optimize tcf_match_indev() Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:23:53 -0500 Message-ID: <52B4D189.7050404@mojatatu.com> References: <1387503292-20078-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1387503292-20078-2-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1387520573.19078.424.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1387522459.19078.427.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <52B434A9.9070408@mojatatu.com> <52B4A6C0.605@mojatatu.com> <52B4CC21.8030801@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linux Kernel Network Developers , "David S. Miller" To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:61560 "EHLO mail-ie0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751259Ab3LTXXz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:23:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id lx4so3966998iec.9 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:23:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/20/13 18:07, Cong Wang wrote: > > I said I never triggered Eric's crash with `tc action ls ...`, nor > with any of my other test case. > > And I also said I added 'tc action ls...' _after_ David merged it, > so failed to notice the difference. > You didnt say that last part. That was the confusing part. > Clear? > Yes, making a lot more sense ;-> cheers, jamal