From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:07:12 -0500 Message-ID: <52B83580.2010601@mojatatu.com> References: <52B6DC9B.9060309@mojatatu.com> <20131222.175015.561115381077901987.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:51130 "EHLO mail-ig0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756990Ab3LWNHQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:07:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hk11so20954389igb.0 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:07:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131222.175015.561115381077901987.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/22/13 17:50, David Miller wrote: > From: Jamal Hadi Salim > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:35:39 -0500 > >> This bug seems to have been around for some time, nothing to do with >> recent changes; i am just doing tests i havent run in a while and >> saw it. It is against net-next. If you think it is important enough, >> I could also create one against linus tree.. > > Jamal, I've tried to be patient with you over the years, but I really > need you to start submitting your changes more cleanly. > Ok, let me know how this one went ;-> I think i know how to send this way if you find it fits your workflow. cheers, jamal