From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DD1E007DC for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8295C21E1628 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52B879B7.8000808@mindchasers.com> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:58:15 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto discussion list Subject: Development of Yocto Project Kernel outside of Intel? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:58:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Can someone please share with me the forecast (or any info) on whether the Yocto Project Kernel methodology will be picked up by additional non Intel cores / companies in 2014 or beyond? I was just reviewing the available branches in linux-yocto-dev and linux-yocto-3.10, and I see that the overwhelming majority of them are for Intel chipsets / development boards. It seems to me that the methodology documented in the Yocto Project Kernel manuals is well thought out and useful. However, due to the cores that I have chosen to use to date, it's just been something I browse through and forget about. I think it would be great if all the Yocto member companies that are deploying processors would jump on board and support their kernel(s) the same way. Any information regarding this will be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Bob