From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net_sched: mirred: remove action when the target device is gone Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:05:54 -0500 Message-ID: <52B8C1D2.9070100@mojatatu.com> References: <1387167311-14763-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1387167311-14763-4-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <52B1B1B1.2060501@mojatatu.com> <52B1FC6D.7040005@mojatatu.com> <52B71024.3090504@mojatatu.com> <52B74C3A.1050900@mojatatu.com> <52B82F80.8070902@mojatatu.com> <52B89FEB.9090503@mojatatu.com> <52B8B98C.7050200@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , "David S. Miller" To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:39617 "EHLO mail-ie0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932309Ab3LWXF4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:05:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e14so6537968iej.14 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:05:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/23/13 17:51, Cong Wang wrote: [..] > Great! Then show me how to do remove a mirred action upon > the target device is gone in user-space, please? [..] > Your replies show you care about policy vs mechanism very much, > but you even don't do any thing with either 1) try to show me how > the user-space implements it or 2) go head to make same mechanism > for filters (and qdisc) as well. > > Do something to prove that you said. :) Otherwise, I think you are kidding > me. > No disrespect intended Cong - but lets just end this discussion agreeing to disagree. On my side I violently disagree. I hope not to spend any more energy on this. cheers, jamal