From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:44:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B8E6E3.5010003@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B870E5.3020708@intel.com>
On 2013/12/24 1:20, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient
>> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp.
>>
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c509.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sp.c | 10 ++++------
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb3/l2t.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_pp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ksz884x.c | 9 ++++-----
>> drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c | 8 ++------
>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_hw.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_io.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/fddi/skfp/fplustm.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/plip/plip.c | 2 +-
>> net/caif/cfrfml.c | 2 +-
>> 27 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> What is it you are trying to optimize for, size or speed? Most of these
> calls are in slow path. Replacing the memcmp with an inline operation
> may provide little to no gain in terms of speed and in many cases as you
> might actually be increasing the resultant driver size.
>
> Also I would recommend reviewing the addresses you are comparing. It is
> likely that you could use ether_addr_equal or compare_ether_addr in many
> cases as I suspect a number of spots are using 16b aligned MAC addresses
> for both operands.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> .
Yes, as the title said, slight optimization, and I think there will be no
negative effect for these places. The patchset still have many problem,
many places should use the ether_addr_equal as you said, I will fix it later.
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
Regards
Ding
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-24 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-23 5:09 [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules Ding Tianhong
2013-12-23 5:09 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-23 17:20 ` [E1000-devel] " Alexander Duyck
2013-12-23 18:08 ` Greg Rose
2013-12-23 18:08 ` Greg Rose
2013-12-24 1:44 ` Ding Tianhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B8E6E3.5010003@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.