From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk_bundles
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:39:45 +0800
Message-ID: <52B91E21.1050907@windriver.com>
References: <1387424650.19078.355.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>	<52B3BAD1.30205@windriver.com>	<52B8DF80.2010508@windriver.com> <20131224.003125.1848179270970861998.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:46909 "EHLO
	mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750797Ab3LXFkL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 00:40:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20131224.003125.1848179270970861998.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>



On 2013=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5 13:31, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:12:32 +0800
>
>> >  I saw this patch is marked 'Not Applicable' in patchwork.
> It means that it doesn't go in via my tree directly, it
> "doesn't apply".
>
> Instead, it goes into Steffen's IPSEC tree.
>

Thanks for your explanation!!!

I'm not well understand the curtsy about patchwork, and one last questi=
on,
[PATCHv4 net-next 0/8] pktgen IPsec support is tagged as 'Awaiting Upst=
ream'
what does that mean and do I need to take further action about this pat=
ch set?


--=20
=E6=B5=AE=E6=B2=89=E9=9A=8F=E6=B5=AA=E5=8F=AA=E8=AE=B0=E4=BB=8A=E6=9C=9D=
=E7=AC=91

--fan