From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 06:58:32 -0500 Message-ID: <52BC19E8.5010602@mojatatu.com> References: <1387803733-19709-1-git-send-email-jhs@mojatatu.com> <1387803733-19709-2-git-send-email-jhs@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Eric Dumazet To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:62780 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944Ab3LZL7A (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 06:59:00 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uy17so19399416igb.4 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 03:59:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/23/13 19:41, Cong Wang wrote: > > Therefore should go to net rather than net-next? > I asked that question to Dave. Will let him call it. This one sits on patches that are on top of net-next. cheers, jamal