From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] AMD/microcode: Avoid use-after-free for the microcode buffer Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: <52BD9E7B.5000708@citrix.com> References: <1388156253-14509-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1388156253-14509-4-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <52BD9D24.30008@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52BD9D24.30008@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27/12/2013 15:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/27/2013 09:57 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> It is possible to free the mc_old buffer and the store it for use on >> in the > > I think you don't need *the* store here. And no *on*. Oops - I refactored my sentence half way through, and missed that on a reread. > >> case of resume. >> >> This keeps the old semantics of being able to return an error even >> after a >> successful microcode application. >> >> Coverity-ID 1146953 >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper >> CC: Keir Fraser >> CC: Jan Beulich >> CC: Boris Ostrovsky >> CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c | 17 +++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c >> index a3ceef8..8ea4e63 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c >> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const >> void *buf, size_t bufsize) >> struct microcode_amd *mc_amd, *mc_old; >> size_t offset = bufsize; >> size_t last_offset, applied_offset = 0; >> - int error = 0; >> + int error = 0, save_error = 1; >> struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu); >> /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ >> @@ -338,19 +338,20 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(int cpu, const >> void *buf, size_t bufsize) >> */ >> if ( applied_offset ) >> { >> - int ret = get_ucode_from_buffer_amd(mc_amd, buf, bufsize, >> - &applied_offset); >> - if ( ret == 0 ) >> - xfree(mc_old); >> - else >> - error = ret; >> + save_error = get_ucode_from_buffer_amd( >> + mc_amd, buf, bufsize, &applied_offset); >> + >> + if ( save_error ) >> + error = save_error >> } >> - if ( !applied_offset || error ) >> + if ( save_error ) >> { >> xfree(mc_amd); >> uci->mc.mc_amd = mc_old; >> } >> + else >> + xfree(mc_old); > > Won't this free mc_old (which is where previous microcode lived) even > if the new buffer didn't have any valid microcode (i.e. applied_offset > is zero)? > > -boris save_error starts off as 1, and only gets set to 0 on a successful get_ucode_from_buffer_amd(), so we will only free mc_old in the case that we have valid microcde in mc_amd. All other cases free mc_amd and revert to using mc_old. ~Andrew > > >> out: >> svm_host_osvw_init(); >