Re: [PATCH v4 23/23] compat/mingw.h: Fix the MinGW and msvc builds

[Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>]

On 28/12/13 10:00, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:08:57PM +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>>> From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
>>> ---
>>>  compat/mingw.h | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/compat/mingw.h b/compat/mingw.h
>>> index 92cd728..8828ede 100644
>>> --- a/compat/mingw.h
>>> +++ b/compat/mingw.h
>>> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static inline char *mingw_find_last_dir_sep(const char *path)
>>>  #define PATH_SEP ';'
>>>  #define PRIuMAX "I64u"
>>>  #define PRId64 "I64d"
>>> +#define PRIx64 "I64x"
>>>
>>
>> Please, move this before patch #8, and adjust the commit message.
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense. Though I think we can do one better and simply
> remove the need for it entirely. The only use of PRIx64 is in a
> debugging function that does not get called.
> 
> How about squashing the patch below into patch 8 ("ewah: compressed
> bitmap implementation"):
> 
> diff --git a/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c b/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> index f104b87..9ced2da 100644
> --- a/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> +++ b/ewah/ewah_bitmap.c
> @@ -381,18 +381,6 @@ void ewah_iterator_init(struct ewah_iterator *it, struct ewah_bitmap *parent)
>  		read_new_rlw(it);
>  }
>  
> -void ewah_dump(struct ewah_bitmap *self)
> -{
> -	size_t i;
> -	fprintf(stderr, "%"PRIuMAX" bits | %"PRIuMAX" words | ",
> -		(uintmax_t)self->bit_size, (uintmax_t)self->buffer_size);
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < self->buffer_size; ++i)
> -		fprintf(stderr, "%016"PRIx64" ", (uint64_t)self->buffer[i]);
> -
> -	fprintf(stderr, "\n");
> -}
> -
>  void ewah_not(struct ewah_bitmap *self)
>  {
>  	size_t pointer = 0;
> diff --git a/ewah/ewok.h b/ewah/ewok.h
> index 619afaa..43adeb5 100644
> --- a/ewah/ewok.h
> +++ b/ewah/ewok.h
> @@ -193,8 +193,6 @@ void ewah_and(
>  	struct ewah_bitmap *ewah_j,
>  	struct ewah_bitmap *out);
>  
> -void ewah_dump(struct ewah_bitmap *self);
> -
>  /**
>   * Direct word access
>   */

I'm always in favour of removing unused (or unwanted) code! :-D

ATB,
Ramsay Jones