From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36711)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Vxe8l-0004g5-29
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:48:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Vxe8c-0006Wx-LN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:48:22 -0500
Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]:45152)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1Vxe8c-0006Wm-Gi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:48:14 -0500
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e9so10773539qcy.26
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52C187AA.2010807@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:48:10 -0800
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFEAcA8oivti3Fpd7H3AtQqjONafddD5==pxBdz=w+5UOFUAUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8oivti3Fpd7H3AtQqjONafddD5==pxBdz=w+5UOFUAUg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] correct TCG_CALL_* flags for helpers which
 directly access env fields?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 12/28/2013 08:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Assuming the fields
> it accesses aren't also being used for TCG memory globals,
> presumably NO_RWG_SE if the field is only read, and
> NO_RWG if it's written?

Correct.


r~