From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751903AbaACMLq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:11:46 -0500
Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:19741 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751116AbaACMLo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:11:44 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,597,1384300800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="89513555"
Message-ID: <52C6A8FE.5000500@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:11:42 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121215 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 14/18] xen/grant: Implement an grant frame
 array struct.
References: <1388550945-25499-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>	<1388550945-25499-15-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>	<52C59367.70707@citrix.com> <20140102184754.GF3021@pegasus.dumpdata.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140102184754.GF3021@pegasus.dumpdata.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.76]
X-DLP: MIA2
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02/01/14 18:47, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:27:19PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> The 'xen_hvm_resume_frames' used to be an 'unsigned long'
>>> and contain the virtual address of the grants. That was OK
>>> for most architectures (PVHVM, ARM) were the grants are contingous
>>> in memory. That however is not the case for PVH - in which case
>>> we will have to do a lookup for each virtual address for the PFN.
>>>
>>> Instead of doing that, lets make it a structure which will contain
>>> the array of PFNs, the virtual address and the count of said PFNs.
>>>
>>> Also provide a generic functions: gnttab_setup_auto_xlat_frames and
>>> gnttab_free_auto_xlat_frames to populate said structure with
>>> appropiate values for PVHVM and ARM.
>>>
>>> To round it off, change the name from 'xen_hvm_resume_frames' to
>>> a more descriptive one - 'xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames'.
>>>
>>> For PVH, in patch "xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM for grant driver"
>>> we will populate the 'xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames' by ourselves.
>> [...]
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/grant-table.c
>> [...]
>>> @@ -838,6 +838,40 @@ unsigned int gnttab_max_grant_frames(void)
>>>  }
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gnttab_max_grant_frames);
>>>  
>>> +int gnttab_setup_auto_xlat_frames(unsigned long addr)
>>> +{
>>> +	xen_pfn_t *pfn;
>>> +	unsigned int max_nr_gframes = __max_nr_grant_frames();
>>> +	int i;
>>> +
>>> +	if (xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.count)
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +	pfn = kcalloc(max_nr_gframes, sizeof(pfn[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!pfn)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < max_nr_gframes; i++)
>>> +		pfn[i] = PFN_DOWN(addr + (i * PAGE_SIZE));
>>
>> PFN_DOWN(addr) + i looks better to me.
>>
>>> +
>>> +	xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.vaddr = addr;

I think you should move the xen_remap() call here.

>> Huh? addr is a physical address but you're assigning it to a field
>> called vaddr?  I think you mean to set this field to the result of the
>> xen_remap() call, yes?
> 
> It ends up doing that in gnttab_init. Not to
> xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.vaddr but to gnttab_shared.addr.

David