From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:47:59 +0000 Subject: Re: [lksctp-tools] [1.0.15] Regression test broken due to test_1_to_1_sockopt - SO_SNDBUF Message-Id: <52C6DBAF.5010207@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <52C6D85C.2020407@nsn.com> In-Reply-To: <52C6D85C.2020407@nsn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org On 01/03/2014 04:33 PM, Matija Glavinic Pecotic wrote: > Hello sctp folks, > > sctp regression suite is currently broken due to test_1_to_1_sockopt. > > Problem is following: > > TEST17 sets SO_SNDBUF to 2048 > > TEST18 gets SO_SNDBUF, expected is 2x2048, but obtained value is 4480 > >> test_1_to_1_sockopt.c 17 PASS : setsockopt() SO_SNDBUF - SUCCESS >> test_1_to_1_sockopt.c 18 PASS : getsockopt() SO_SNDBUF - SUCCESS >> test_1_to_1_sockopt.c 19 BROK : Comparison failed:Set value and got value differs Set Value@96 Get ValueD80 > > reason lies is net/core/sock.c > >> case SO_SNDBUF: >> /* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think >> * about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to >> * play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF >> * are treated in BSD as hints >> */ >> val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max); >> set_sndbuf: >> sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK; >> sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF); > > since SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF is defined as: > > include/net/sock.h >> /* Since sk_{r,w}mem_alloc sums skb->truesize, even a small frame might >> * need sizeof(sk_buff) + MTU + padding, unless net driver perform copybreak. >> * Note: for send buffers, TCP works better if we can build two skbs at >> * minimum. >> */ >> #define TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE (2048 + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct sk_buff))) >> >> #define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF (TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE * 2) >> #define SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE > > we can observe that value for which we set SO_SNDBUF in TEST17 in test_1_to_1_sockopt.c needs to be increased > > Version is visible in subject, 1.0.15, I hope http://sourceforge.net/projects/lksctp/files/ is still valid place to get it. Already fixed in the current git tree (see lksctp.org) under b7ad1afc16cb0c5 ("tests: fix test_1_to_1_sockopt sock buff test case".) Will do a release some time next week. > Best regards, > > Matija > > PS: happy new year! > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >