All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] initscripts: split the functions script into a separate package
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:23:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C72A60.9010702@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ddc616565a80346dd323664d0c36490a698fb89.1388629298.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>

On 01/01/2014 06:25 PM, Chen Qi wrote:
> Many SysV init scripts need the /etc/init.d/functions script. But
> this script is part of the initscripts package. As a result, the
> initscripts package should always be installed into the system to
> avoid errors when starting daemons. However, it makes no sense to
> install the initscripts package into a systemd based image, because
> what the init scripts provide has already been provided by the systemd.
> On the other hand, the functions script might be still needed in a
> systemd based image because other init scripts such as distcc might need
> it.
>
> The above situation leads to a natural separation of the functions script
> from the initscripts package. And this patch does so. It separates the
> functions script into initscripts-functions packages.
>

There seems to be a problem with the multi-lib build, please check this 
logfile for errors.

http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/71/steps/Building%20Images/logs/stdio

Thanks	
	Sau!


> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
>   meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb |    8 ++++++--
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb b/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
> index 5951e0c..ea28672 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
> @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ KERNEL_VERSION = ""
>   inherit update-alternatives
>   DEPENDS_append = " update-rc.d-native"
>
> -ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "90"
> -ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "functions"
> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-functions"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${PN}-functions"
> +FILES_${PN}-functions = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/functions.${PN}"
> +
> +ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY_${PN}-functions = "90"
> +ALTERNATIVE_${PN}-functions = "functions"
>   ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[functions] = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/functions"
>
>   HALTARGS ?= "-d -f"
>


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-03 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-02  2:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] Split the functions script into a separate package in initscripts Chen Qi
2014-01-02  2:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] initscripts: split the functions script into a separate package Chen Qi
2014-01-03 21:23   ` Saul Wold [this message]
2014-01-06  7:29     ` ChenQi
2014-01-02  2:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] Add missing RDEPENDS of initscripts-functions Chen Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52C72A60.9010702@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Qi.Chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.