From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:04:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C85B34.6040001@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140105023853.dda6c1f9c6f9875159634e69@canb.auug.org.au>
On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
>> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
>> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
>> other syscall. It is absurd to have the option in the
>> arch-specific menus.
>
> You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture
> versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...
I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away. I can't find any
reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code. Is there some
/proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
/proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-02 20:20 [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options Dave Hansen
2014-01-02 20:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] Kconfig: collapse initrd in to own menu Dave Hansen
2014-01-02 20:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] Kconfig: organize memory-related config options Dave Hansen
2014-01-02 20:20 ` Dave Hansen
2014-02-05 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-05 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-05 16:27 ` Dave Hansen
2014-02-05 16:27 ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options Mimi Zohar
2014-01-02 21:14 ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-04 15:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-04 19:04 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2014-01-04 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-05 0:41 ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-05 10:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13 19:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-13 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-31 17:24 [PATCH 0/3] General Kconfig reorganization Dave Hansen
2014-01-31 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C85B34.6040001@sr71.net \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.