From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/xen: set regions above the end of
 RAM as 1:1
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:20:52 +0000
Message-ID: <52CA9194.8040600@citrix.com>
References: <1388767522-11768-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<1388767522-11768-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1401031805160.8667@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401031805160.8667@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/01/14 18:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> PCI devices may have BARs located above the end of RAM so mark such
>> frames as identity frames in the p2m (instead of the default of
>> missing).
>>
>> PFNs outside the p2m (above MAX_P2M_PFN) are also considered to be
>> identity frames for the same reason.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> Shouldn't this be the case only for dom0?

I don't see why.  DomUs can have PCI devices with high MMIO regions
passed-through.

>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn)
>>  	unsigned topidx, mididx, idx;
>>  
>>  	if (unlikely(pfn >= MAX_P2M_PFN))
>> -		return INVALID_P2M_ENTRY;
>> +		return IDENTITY_FRAME(pfn);
>>  
>>  	topidx = p2m_top_index(pfn);
>>  	mididx = p2m_mid_index(pfn);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
>> index 68c054f..6d7798f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
>> @@ -412,6 +412,16 @@ char * __init xen_memory_setup(void)
>>  		max_pfn = min(MAX_DOMAIN_PAGES, last_pfn);
>>  		mem_end = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
>>  	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Set the rest as identity mapped, in case PCI BARs are
>> +	 * located here.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * PFNs above MAX_P2M_PFN are considered identity mapped as
>> +	 * well.
>> +	 */
>> +	set_phys_range_identity(max_pfn + 1, ~0ul);
>> +
> 
> Wouldn't this increase the size of the P2M considerably?

I thought the p2m code would be smart but I see I need to add a
p2m_mid_identity page (similar to the existign p2m_mid_missing page) and
make sure we use it.

David