From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0A74-0000V0-05 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:21:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0A6z-00022T-3U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:21:01 -0500 Received: from mx.ipv6.kamp.de ([2a02:248:0:51::16]:59380 helo=mx01.kamp.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0A6y-00022P-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:20:56 -0500 Message-ID: <52CAAE17.5040202@kamp.de> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:22:31 +0100 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1389012883-24516-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> <52CAACE7.9010106@kamp.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Makefile: properly install bios-256k.bin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann On 06.01.2014 14:17, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 January 2014 13:17, Peter Lieven wrote: >> On 06.01.2014 14:12, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> On 6 January 2014 12:54, Peter Lieven wrote: >> >> Commit bcf2b7d introduced new 256k seabios files. However, >> they were not installed. >> >> This is a dup of this patch by Eduardo from last month: >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/299233/ >> >> Thanks for the pointer. However, this patch is not in master atm. > Yes, that's why I quoted a patchwork URL rather than > a commit hash :-) > > In general, the first of several identical patches for a > fix is the one that should be committed, and there's not > much point in sending in duplicates (especially when the > first patch already has review tags.) thats clear. I did not want to have credit for this I have just not realized that there is already a patch. Peter