From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv2.trombetti.net ([65.254.53.252]:3018 "EHLO server"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754767AbaAFPtu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:49:50 -0500
Message-ID: <52CAD0A0.8000306@shiftmail.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:49:52 +0100
From: joystick <joystick@shiftmail.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
CC: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
References: <1389000716-3274-1-git-send-email-amadvance@gmail.com> <52CA9A97.4000803@shiftmail.org> <laea0q$d0g$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <laea0q$d0g$2@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 06/01/2014 14:11, Alex Elsayed wrote:
> joystick wrote:
>
>> Just by looking at the Subjects, it seems patch number 0/1 is missing.
>> It might have not gotten through to the lists, or be a numbering mistake.
> No, the numbering style is ${index}/${total}, where index = 0 is a cover
> letter. So there are two patches total, 1/2 and 2/2, with the cover letter
> 0/2.

Ok sorry, I meant

"Just by looking at the Subjects, it seems patch number 1/2 is missing."

and not 0/1

Can you see the 1/2 on the lists? I can't.

J.