All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: intel_pstate divide error with v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 09:18:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CAE574.3010304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C7345D.30603@redhat.com>

On 01/03/2014 02:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/01/2014 21:00, Dirk Brandewie ha scritto:
>> +    case MSR_IA32_MPERF:
>> +    case MSR_IA32_APERF:
>
OK I will spin the patch to only add MSR_PLATFORM_INFO.

> These should never be accessed.  A KVM VM will always have
> CPUID[06H].ECX = 0, and the Intel manual says that the MSRs are only
> present if CPUID returns that value with bit 0 set.
>
> I think the actual bug is that intel_pstate_init does not check the
> feature bits in CPUID (either manually or via x86_match_cpu).

I will add the feature check.

What are the differences between the first and the nested KVM's?
At load time intel_pstate checks that APERF and MPERF are incrementing
and that PLATFORM_INFO has some value.  Somehow these checks pass
in the nested environment and we fall over when the CPU is being added
by cpufreq.

--Dirk


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-06 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-24 14:36 intel_pstate divide error with v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad Josh Boyer
2013-12-24 16:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-27 12:24   ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-27 12:47     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 13:46       ` Josh Boyer
2013-12-27 14:15         ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-27 14:34           ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-27 16:52           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 17:01             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 17:17               ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-27 17:17               ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-27 21:51                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-29 12:12                   ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-29 15:04                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-30 14:58                       ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-31  2:07                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-03 17:30                           ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-01-03 18:04                             ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-03 20:00                               ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-01-03 22:06                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-06 17:18                                   ` Dirk Brandewie [this message]
2014-01-07 16:11                                     ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-03 22:46                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-04  8:35                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-04 14:38                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-04 17:38                                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-04 17:48                                       ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-04 21:38                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 11:20                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-06 11:37                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 18:40                                               ` Dirk Brandewie
2013-12-27 14:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-27 14:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CAE574.3010304@gmail.com \
    --to=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.