All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Salter <jim@jrs-s.net>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:24:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CB2D29.4070302@jrs-s.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FC5CA49-4BEE-49D5-B475-5E16DD76BF06@colorremedies.com>

No, the installer is completely unaware. What I was getting at is that 
rebalancing (and installing the bootloader) is dead easy, so it doesn't 
bug me personally much.  It'd be nice to eventually get something in the 
installer to make it obvious to the oblivious that it can be done and 
how, but in the meantime, it's frankly easier to set up btrfs-raid 
WITHOUT installer support than it is to set up mdraid WITH installer support

Install process for 4-drive btrfs-raid10 root on Ubuntu (desktop or server):

1. do single-disk install on first disk, default all the way through 
except picking btrfs instead of ext4 for /
2. sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb ; sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk 
/dev/sdc ; sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdd
3. btrfs dev add /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /
4. btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid10 -mconvert=raid10 /
5. grub-install /dev/sdb ; grub-install /dev/sdc ; grub-install /dev/sdd

Done. The rebalancing takes less than a minute, and the system's 
responsive while it happens.  Once you've done the grub-install on the 
additional drives, you're good to go - Ubuntu already uses the UUID 
instead of a device ID for GRUB and fstab, so the btrfs mount will scan 
all drives and find any that are there. The only hitch is the need to 
mount degraded that I Chicken Littled about earlier so loudly. =)

On 01/06/2014 05:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Jim Salter <jim@jrs-s.net> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, Ubuntu (and I presume Debian) will work just fine with a single / on btrfs, single or multi disk.
>>
>> I currently have two machines booting to a btrfs-raid10 / with no separate /boot, one booting to a btrfs single disk / with no /boot, and one booting to a btrfs-raid10 / with an ext4-on-mdraid1 /boot.
> Did you create the multiple device layouts outside of the installer first?
>
> What I'm seeing in the Ubuntu 12.03.04 installer is a choice of which disk to put the bootloader. If that's reliable UI, then it won't put it on both disks which means a single point of failure in which case -o degraded not being automatic with Btrfs is essentially pointless if we don't have a bootloader. I also see no way in the UI to even create Btrfs raid of any sort.
>
> Chris Murphy


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-06 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-03 22:28 btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT Jim Salter
2014-01-03 22:42 ` Emil Karlson
2014-01-03 22:43 ` Joshua Schüler
2014-01-03 22:56   ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:04     ` Hugo Mills
2014-01-03 23:04     ` Joshua Schüler
2014-01-03 23:13       ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:18         ` Hugo Mills
2014-01-03 23:25           ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:32             ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-03 23:22         ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04  6:10           ` Duncan
2014-01-04 11:20             ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-04 13:03               ` Duncan
2014-01-04 14:51             ` Chris Mason
2014-01-04 15:23               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-01-04 20:08               ` Duncan
2014-01-04 21:22             ` Jim Salter
2014-01-05 11:01               ` Duncan
2014-01-03 23:19     ` Chris Murphy
     [not found]     ` <CAOjFWZ7zC3=4oH6=SBZA+PhZMrSK1KjxoRN6L2vqd=GTBKKTQA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-03 23:42       ` Jim Salter
2014-01-03 23:45         ` Jim Salter
2014-01-04  0:27         ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04  2:59           ` Jim Salter
2014-01-04  5:57             ` Dave
2014-01-04 11:28               ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-04 14:56                 ` Chris Mason
2014-01-05  9:20                   ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-05 11:16                     ` Duncan
2014-01-04 19:18             ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-04 21:16               ` Jim Salter
2014-01-05 20:25                 ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 10:20                   ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-06 18:30                     ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 19:25                       ` Jim Salter
2014-01-06 22:05                         ` Chris Murphy
2014-01-06 22:24                           ` Jim Salter [this message]
2014-01-07  5:43                         ` Chris Samuel
2014-01-06 19:31                       ` correct way to rollback a root filesystem? Jim Salter
2014-01-07 11:55                         ` Sander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CB2D29.4070302@jrs-s.net \
    --to=jim@jrs-s.net \
    --cc=chris@csamuel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.