All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:12:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CB7090.2050205@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CB7016.707@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 01/07/2014 11:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 01/07/2014 12:30 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 05:25:06PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>
>>>   # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
>>>   # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
>>>   # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
>>>   # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
>>>   # btrfs send /mnt/snap2 -p /mnt/snap1
>>>
>>> As @send_root will also add into clone_sources, and we should
>>> take care not to decrease its count twice.
>> Yes, send_root is appended to the clone_roots but the
>> clone_sources_to_rollback does not track this, it's not updated after
>> it's added in
>>
>>    sctx->clone_roots[sctx->clone_roots_cnt++].root = sctx->send_root;
>>
>> so send->root->send_in_progress is not modified in the loop that
>> decrements all clone_root's counters again.
>>
>> I don't see the warning that should catch negative values of the counter
>> in btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress. Am I missing something?
> You are right here, but problem still exist.
>
> The problem is that we will sort clone sources before we decrease count,
> When sorting clone counts, we include send_root, and it will push to 
> the first
> place.....and when we try to free send_root count, it will be 
> decreased twice.
>
> Hope i am not wrong this time!
>
> Thanks Daivd to force me dig more!

My steps is a little problem, if you try this, you will find the warnig:

# btrfs sub snapshot . -r snap1
# btrfs sub snapshot . -r snap2
# btrfs send snap1 -p snap2 -f 1
# dmesg


>
>>
>>
>> david
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
>> linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


      reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-06  9:25 [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting Wang Shilong
2014-01-06 16:30 ` David Sterba
2014-01-07  1:27   ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-07  3:10   ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-07  3:12     ` Wang Shilong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CB7090.2050205@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.